On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 12:03:51PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 12:33:48PM +0100, Paul van Tilburg wrote: > > The USB block device is known to be experimental and buggy. > > CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB=m should be set to 'n'. > > > > Since the ub modules takes preference of the old, though working > > usb-storage, hotplug loads ub. Blacklisting ub doesn't help, loading > > usb-storage doesn't work either. > > I really would like for UB to be disable until proven reasonably stable. > > Can someone merge this bug with #283852, plz? I'm unsure which of them > to reassign.
The merge thing doesn't work well with the way we have multiple source packages for the kernel. It seems that this problem actually effects the following source packages. kernel-image-2.6.10-alpha-2.6.10 kernel-image-2.6.10-ia64-2.6.10 kernel-image-2.6.9-amd64-2.6.9 kernel-image-2.6.9-ia64-2.6.9 kernel-image-2.6.9-sparc-2.6.9 kernel-patch-2.6.10-mips-2.6.10 kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.10-2.6.10 kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.9-2.6.9 Would it be of value to duplicate, say #283852, assign one copy to each of these source packages, and then merge #283852 with #284952 on one package, say kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.9-2.6.9, where at one of the bugs originated. Also, sould I go through and fix the config in svn, even though I can't build for any of these architectures? -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
