Your message dated Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:05:05 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bluez-bcm203x firmware loader depends on non-free firmware
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Feb 2005 19:25:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 01 11:25:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from out004pub.verizon.net (out004.verizon.net) [206.46.170.142] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Cw3e2-0001er-00; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 11:25:02 -0800
Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([4.5.66.209]) by out004.verizon.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP
          id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
          for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:24:56 -0600
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 11:24:12 -0800
From: Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050105 
Debian/1.7.5-1
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: bluez-bcm203x firmware loader depends on non-free firmware
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="------------enigFA85F3702B86EE08D4BEAC53"
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out004.verizon.net from 
[4.5.66.209] at Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:24:51 -0600
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigFA85F3702B86EE08D4BEAC53
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Package: bluez-bcm203x
Version: 2.10-4
Severity: serious

[Previously discussed via private mail with maintainer.  I'm going ahead
and reporting this to have it recorded somewhere.]

 From the description of bluez-bcm203x:
> Firmware loader for Broadcom 203x based Bluetooth devices
> This package contains a firmware loader for users of the 2.4 Linux
> kernel and Broadcom 203x based Bluetooth devices.

 From debian/copyright of the non-free bluez-firmware package, which
contains the firmware this package can load:
> The BlueZ project has permission from Broadcom Corporation to
> distribute this firmware in conjunction with the BlueZ GPLd
> tools, available in Debian as bluez-utils, as long as the notice
> contained in /usr/share/doc/bluez-firmware/BCM-LEGAL.txt accompanies
> the firmware.
>
> This arrangement was made with BlueZ author Max Krasnyansky
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

This raises many issues:

* Since bluez-bcm203x seems to exist only to load this non-free
firmware, it should have a "Depends: bluez-firmware" rather than
"Suggests: bluez-firmware".

* For the same reason, the bluez-bcm203x package should be moved to contrib.

* The indicated grant of permission to distribute requires that the
distribution be "in conjunction with the BlueZ GPLd tools, available in
Debian as bluez-utils".  Given that non-free isn't part of Debian, it
seems difficult to argue that the bluez-firmware package in non-free is
being distributed "in conjunction with" the blues-utils package in main,
or even a bluez-bcm203x package in contrib.

- Josh Triplett


--------------enigFA85F3702B86EE08D4BEAC53
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFB/9dcGJuZRtD+evsRAteWAKCC1XA5pSgMNwJkAPMI/sHIb7OGNQCcCfMW
n7OdVC/iD7ABLLrlCxw9ujg=
=7Neh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigFA85F3702B86EE08D4BEAC53--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 293210-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Feb 2005 13:05:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 18 05:05:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) 
[66.93.39.86] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D27oi-0005Rh-00; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:05:08 -0800
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 02F80171D60; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:05:05 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:05:05 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bluez-bcm203x firmware loader depends on non-free firmware
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jI8keyz6grp/JLjh"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--jI8keyz6grp/JLjh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The bluez-bcm203x package has been moved to contrib with the most recent
upload (which just cleared NEW), so this bug is fixed.

Cheers,
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

--jI8keyz6grp/JLjh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCFef9KN6ufymYLloRAvHvAJ0VL126UGeCAG8/9WqiI5JXyKYchACeLJjh
7VeDHozloyWKJzITUSbz5Dg=
=tpR3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--jI8keyz6grp/JLjh--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to