On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 03:02:25PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Yes, the problem is this second part, which results in binary packages in > the archive that are not built as a result of ./debian/rules binary. This > is non-standard, and in particular complicates the matter of security > support post-release. > > If these are merely convenience packages that nothing depends on, it may be > best to remove them from the archive and just ship the oprofile-source > package. If so, please reassign this bug to ftp.debian.org.
Just for the record, I rejected all oprofile-source-built kernel module packages from NEW, so if it stays this way, and the -source package is useful as is (without those module packages uploaded into the archive), it's fine as far as I'm concerned. If you want them in the archive though, yeah, you need to fix the build system. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
