Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2004 15:25:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 06 07:25:32 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pd9e7de86.dip.t-dialin.net (stigge.org) [217.231.222.134] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CQSRY-00084p-00; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 07:25:32 -0800
Received: (qmail 20065 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2004 15:25:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO atari.stigge.org) (192.168.1.99)
  by sbo.stigge.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2004 15:25:29 -0000
Received: from [192.168.1.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by atari.stigge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0A91007E398;
        Sat,  6 Nov 2004 16:25:28 +0100 (CET)
From: Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: opie-pim-fb: FTBFS: g++ compile error: no matching function for call 
to ctor QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat,  6 Nov 2004 16:25:28 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: opie-pim-fb
Version: 0.9.3-1
Severity: serious

Hi,

building the package opie-pim-fb in a clean build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:

=========================================================================
[...]
g++ -c -pipe  -DQWS -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti  -Wall -W  -O2  -DQT_NO_DEBUG 
-I/tmp/buildd/opie-pim-fb-0.9.3/include -I/usr/share/qte2/include 
-I/tmp/buildd/opie-pim-fb-0.9.3/mkspecs/qws/linux-generic-g++ -o 
configdlg_base.o configdlg_base.cpp
configdlg_base.cpp: In constructor `ConfigDlg_Base::ConfigDlg_Base(QWidget*, 
   const char*, bool, unsigned int)':
configdlg_base.cpp:39: error: no matching function for call to `QSizePolicy::
   QSizePolicy(QSizePolicy::SizeType, QSizePolicy::SizeType, int, int, bool)'
/usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:46: error: candidates are: 
   QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(const QSizePolicy&)
/usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:93: error:                 
   QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(int)
/usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:100: error:                 
   QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(QSizePolicy::SizeType, QSizePolicy::SizeType, bool)
/usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:63: error:                 
   QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy()
configdlg_base.cpp:44: error: no matching function for call to `QSizePolicy::
   QSizePolicy(QSizePolicy::SizeType, QSizePolicy::SizeType, int, int, bool)'
/usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:46: error: candidates are: 
   QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(const QSizePolicy&)
/usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:93: error:                 
   QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(int)
/usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:100: error:                 
   QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(QSizePolicy::SizeType, QSizePolicy::SizeType, bool)
/usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:63: error:                 
   QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy()
configdlg_base.cpp:146: error: no matching function for call to `QSizePolicy::
   QSizePolicy(QSizePolicy::SizeType, QSizePolicy::SizeType, int, int, bool)'
/usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:46: error: candidates are: 
   QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(const QSizePolicy&)
/usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:93: error:                 
   QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(int)
[...]
   QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(int)
/usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:100: error:                 
   QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(QSizePolicy::SizeType, QSizePolicy::SizeType, bool)
/usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:63: error:                 
   QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy()
configdlg_base.cpp:168: error: no matching function for call to `QSizePolicy::
   QSizePolicy(QSizePolicy::SizeType, QSizePolicy::SizeType, int, int, bool)'
/usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:46: error: candidates are: 
   QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(const QSizePolicy&)
/usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:93: error:                 
   QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(int)
/usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:100: error:                 
   QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(QSizePolicy::SizeType, QSizePolicy::SizeType, bool)
/usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:63: error:                 
   QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy()
configdlg_base.cpp:177: error: no matching function for call to `QSizePolicy::
   QSizePolicy(QSizePolicy::SizeType, QSizePolicy::SizeType, int, int, bool)'
/usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:46: error: candidates are: 
   QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(const QSizePolicy&)
/usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:93: error:                 
   QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(int)
/usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:100: error:                 
   QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(QSizePolicy::SizeType, QSizePolicy::SizeType, bool)
/usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:63: error:                 
   QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy()
make[2]: *** [configdlg_base.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/opie-pim-fb-0.9.3/core/pim/addressbook'
make[1]: *** [core/pim/addressbook] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/opie-pim-fb-0.9.3'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
=========================================================================

Thanks for considering.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 279996-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 00:41:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 16:41:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DEzMK-0000VA-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:41:00 -0800
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
        id 33C0C64D3D; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 06DC34F1AF; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:50 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +0000
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: opie removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 27

The whole opie set of packages has been removed so I'm closing these
bugs which don't apply anymore.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to