Discussion on IRC about fixing this for release: <vorlon> joeyh: we have non-security-related RC bugs in the sparc kernel that aren't fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-sparc 2.6.8-6. Is rebuilding d-i for a sparc update only better or worse than rebuilding for everything? (Can we do that as a binNMU of d-i?) <vorlon> the one I'm talking about is 288180 * joeyh notes that this will be significantly easier to do after a freeze, when I can know that we have full control over what things have changed <vorlon> kernels are all effectively frozen now anyway, fwiw <fjp> Including the kernel configs. <joeyh> yes, but everything else <vorlon> yes, well. :) <vorlon> so you'd like to let this one sit until we've frozen? <joeyh> if say, nothing that breaks d-i happens to get into testing by accident, then yes, we can binnmu d-i for sparc, rebuild cds and qual it, I'd not imagine more than a day's work
-- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature