Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:29:20 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #298930,
regarding tulip: contains non-free fonts
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) David Auber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 298930-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 13:29:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 26 05:29:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postfix4-1.free.fr [213.228.0.62]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DFBLb-000388-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 05:29:03 -0800
Received: from nanterre-1-81-57-214-146
(nanterre-1-81-57-214-146.fbx.proxad.net [81.57.214.146])
by postfix4-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B60B2C0A18;
Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:29:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dwitch by nanterre-1-81-57-214-146 with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DFBLt-0004xz-I3; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:29:21 +0100
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:29:20 +0100
To: David Auber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tulip and font licences
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="fCcDWlUEdh43YKr8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--fCcDWlUEdh43YKr8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Hello David,
There is a licencing issue with the fonts shipped in the tulip
tarball. It would surely be possible to replace them, for example with
fonts from the Vera series.
I can easily adapt the Debian package to replace the ttf files
(although I'll have to shipped a modified tarball with those non-free
bits removed).
But the Fonts.bmp file annoys me a little : how did you produce it ?
Although it does not seem to be derived from the Luxi fonts, it would
be nice to have a Makefile rule, or even just a README, to help
regenerate it from another font (ie. it is probably not the "preferred
form of the work for making modifications to it" that would qualify as
"source code" for the GPL - although the original font is probably not
covered by the GPL).
Cordialement,
--
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
Debian-related: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
| Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis
http://ydirson.free.fr/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
--fCcDWlUEdh43YKr8
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from pop.altern.org [80.67.174.57]
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-6.2.5)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:50:59 +0100
(CET)
Received: (qmail 9533 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2005 18:58:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx.altern.org) (80.67.174.51)
by altern.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2005 18:58:36 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by mx.altern.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DED99790
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:07:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mx.altern.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (filer [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 28631-01 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:07:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from spohr.debian.org (spohr.debian.org [128.193.0.4])
by mx.altern.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0A99786
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:07:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: from debbugs by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D9Shk-0005vo-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:48:16 -0800
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#298930: tulip: contains non-free fonts
Reply-To: Peter De Wachter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-From: Peter De Wachter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-Cc: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:48:11 UTC
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 298930
X-Debian-PR-Package: tulip
X-Debian-PR-Keywords:
Received: via spool by [EMAIL PROTECTED] id=B.111047984917940
(code B ref -1); Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:48:11 UTC
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 18:37:29 +0000
Received: from mailhost.vub.ac.be (dorado.vub.ac.be) [134.184.129.10]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D9SXJ-0004cN-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:37:29 -0800
Received: from igwe.vub.ac.be (igwe1.vub.ac.be [134.184.49.1])
by dorado.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B007D146
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:36:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from caladan.rave.org ([134.184.49.23])
by igwe.vub.ac.be with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.44)
id 1D9SXG-0004ru-5y
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:37:26 +0100
Received: from pdewacht by caladan.rave.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1D9SWk-0008B6-V1
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:36:55 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Peter De Wachter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:36:54 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Sender: Debian BTS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 tagged_above=-999.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,
BAYES_00
X-Spam-Level:
X-UID: 143379
X-Keywords:
Package: tulip
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Tulip contains two non-free fonts, Luxi Sans Regular and Luxi Sans Bold:
tulip-2.0.0/library/tulip-ogl/bitmaps/font.ttf
tulip-2.0.0/library/tulip-ogl/bitmaps/fontb.ttf
These fonts should be removed. To get replacement fonts, you can depend
on ttf-bitstream-vera, ttf-freefont, or one of the other font packages
in Debian.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9
Locale: LANG=nl_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
--fCcDWlUEdh43YKr8--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
