Your message dated Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:05:16 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301834: monit: #247226 is still present on sarge
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Mar 2005 18:02:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 28 10:02:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailout.stusta.mhn.de) [141.84.69.5]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DFyYu-0003fV-00; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:02:04 -0800
Received: (qmail 24711 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2005 18:01:33 -0000
Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144)
by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 28 Mar 2005 18:01:33 -0000
Received: by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 6695FC7523; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:01:31 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: monit: #247226 is still present on sarge
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:01:31 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: monit
Version: 1:4.2.1-2
Severity: grave
Tags: sarge
Bug #247226 (monit has undeclared stat dependency) is still present
in sarge.
I'm setting the severity that high because this issue breaks
in mixed stable/testing environments that are unfortunately
quite common due to the age of woody.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 301834-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Mar 2005 01:05:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 28 17:05:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain)
[66.93.39.86]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DG5AT-0004HQ-00; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:05:17 -0800
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id CB78B171E11; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:05:16 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:05:16 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#301834: monit: #247226 is still present on sarge
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RpqchZ26BWispMcB"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--RpqchZ26BWispMcB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 08:01:31PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: monit
> Version: 1:4.2.1-2
> Severity: grave
> Tags: sarge
> Bug #247226 (monit has undeclared stat dependency) is still present
> in sarge.
> I'm setting the severity that high because this issue breaks
> in mixed stable/testing environments that are unfortunately
> quite common due to the age of woody.
I've bumped the urgency of monit 1:4.4-4 and am ignoring the missing arm
binary to get this fix into testing; it will go in tonight, so I'm closing
this bug.
Thanks,
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--RpqchZ26BWispMcB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCSKnJKN6ufymYLloRAlfVAJ0TPHMK227LJkOlTJILU2GVrajXJACeMtUw
SwZdYqY1piWyP+0Ma2JVlho=
=X5Xi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--RpqchZ26BWispMcB--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
