On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 04:55:57PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Horms wrote: > > > > with 2.6.11.X, including the numbering (i.e. next upload should be > > > > kernel-source-2.6.11, package version 2.6.11.6-1). > > > > > > I agree it would be good to sync up the patches, > > > but I don't think there is any need to include the > > > .6 in the debian version as we never did this for 2.6.8. > > > > It is much more user-friendly, and it readly provides information on the > > most up-to-date tree it was synced with, in aptitude/dselect/synaptic... > > The kernel usually also includes backports from newer versions, the > fourth level would thus lead to incorrect assumptions. The Debian > kernel is not simply the upstream version in Debian packaging.
Yes I agree. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
