Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > For unsupported/untested architectures, I choose to make it depend on > > nothing, > > although this could be handled better. > > How? I am quite interested in improving the situation for untested archs > if at all possible.
I don't know, I just think there's probably a better fix. Maybe only building the packages on arches with a supported kernel. Or adding support for all arches, as I am trying to do. ;-) However, I just noticed your April 1 updates, looks like we ended up working in the same direction on this dependency problem. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
