Thank you for giving us a zeroconf implementation. I read the bug report about the (C) issue but found it less important than the "upstream" url pointing to a non existant page. I was willing to learn more about this zeroconf implementation and was a bit at lost.
Should i read progsoc mailing list, is debian archive the newx upstream (maybe the url should be changed to the debian archive) ? Today I have asked for the data i was interested in (if zeroconf open ports on the interfaces it uses) : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=302684 Though i have other questions , is this "zeroconf" implementation described in hte ietf draft or does it go beyond it ? I feel lame as the source is available but i am working on other packages right now and would still use zeroconf even .if i won't have time to look it in depth before long. Regards Alban -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
