Le vendredi 08 avril 2005 à 19:22 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit : > Does this bug also occur when using the cifs driver instead of the smbfs > driver?
I couldn't reproduce the problem now... it looks like the bug only happens with a Windows (2000) SMB server because I tried to reproduce the problem with Samba as server and I couldn't manage it (I can't remember the name of the problematic file but I was able to md5sum all files below my directory which contained the problematic file). > It's my impression that the smbfs driver is no longer > well-maintained upstream in 2.6, and that the cifs driver is a better > choice. I'm not sure if we should consider this bug release-critical when > there are lots of other problematic smbfs bugs out there even if this one > gets fixed. Okay, then maybe a release note telling this would be welcome. Regards, -- Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://www.ouaza.com Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com Earn money with free software: http://www.geniustrader.org
