El dom, 24-04-2005 a las 09:17 +0200, Milan Zamazal escribiÃ: > >>>>> "SHG" == Steinar H Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > SHG> I'm not sure if I want to upgrade yet -- I heard lots of report > SHG> the new crm114 in Debian was completely broken (ie. missing > SHG> mailfilter.crm, etc.). Is this fixed now? > > mailfilter.crm is back in /usr/share/crm114/ in 20050415-2. As for the > name of the main CRM114 binary, it's `crm' and NOT `crm114' -- if you > use the latter somewhere, please fix your setup. Otherwise I'm not > aware of any fatal problem -- I haven't received lots of reports about > crm114 being completely broken, only bug #305938. > > Anyway, you should be always careful when upgrading from unstable, > important bugs can be still present. If you don't want to risk it, wait > until crm114 reaches testing and only then test the problem of full .css > files (but please do it, so that I can handle the bug report further).
I am still not sure about binary named changed. I think you should provide a link to the old binary name, as if you don't do that installations in which the old name will break silently, which is a bad thing. With this, I think that the package should not be allowed to propagate to testing. About the css files being full, I have tested and with the new version, after running cssutil -b spam.css (which was the full file) I got a lot of empty slots, and things seem to be working again. Thanks -- Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
