On Tue, 22 May 2007, Eric Valette wrote: > great. I could have read the : Replaces: digikamimageplugins! > Sorry for the mistake. However the unstable developement has been quite > confusing about digikam status for the last few days/week (removing the > plugins, then saying keeping digikam, ...)
No problems. I have added a debian/NEWS entry which should be displayed when you upgraded digikam, but if you think the wording could be improved, please forward suggestions. Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.