On 23 June 2007 at 19:22, Andreas Barth wrote:
| * Dirk Eddelbuettel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070623 19:20]:
| > All I was suggesting as to rename, but instead of
| >
| > libgsl0 -> libgsl0ldbl
| >
| > I'd do
| >
| > libgsl0 -> libgsl1 implying ldbl
| >
| > which may or may not be clear. Given that we're already confused in this
| > mail thread, the former default solution may be better. :)
|
| Ah, *if* you only rename, it doesn't matter how the new name is - but
| please document it properly in the changelog. But most packages don't do
| that at the same time as a change in the soname.
No, I'll stick with the former scheme.
Now, just to recap: No Replace/Provides/Conflicts, right ?
Dirk
--
Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something.
-- Thomas A. Edison
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
