Your message dated Tue, 3 May 2005 11:13:55 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line siproxd
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 19:55:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 22 11:55:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c223012.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.223.12]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDpTV-0000kH-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:55:38 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1DDpTU-0001fU-He; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:55:36 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: siproxd: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): too few arguments to function
'osip_message_parse'
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:55:36 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: siproxd
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
When building 'siproxd' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:
if cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/include -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE
-DBUILDSTR="\"`cat .buildno`\"" -g -Wall -O2 -pthread
-D_POSIX_THREAD_SAFE_FUNCTIONS -MT siproxd.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/siproxd.Tpo" \
-c -o siproxd.o `test -f 'siproxd.c' || echo './'`siproxd.c; \
then mv -f ".deps/siproxd.Tpo" ".deps/siproxd.Po"; \
else rm -f ".deps/siproxd.Tpo"; exit 1; \
fi
siproxd.c: In function 'main':
siproxd.c:332: error: too few arguments to function 'osip_message_parse'
make[3]: *** [siproxd.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/siproxd-0.5.10/src'
With the attached patch 'siproxd' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/siproxd-0.5.10/src/proxy.c ./src/proxy.c
--- ../tmp-orig/siproxd-0.5.10/src/proxy.c 2005-01-24 20:12:40.000000000
+0100
+++ ./src/proxy.c 2005-03-22 16:53:40.606097320 +0100
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@
* RFC 3261, Section 16.6 step 10
* Proxy Behavior - Forward the new request
*/
- sts = osip_message_to_str(request, &buffer);
+ sts = osip_message_to_str(request, &buffer, strlen(buffer));
if (sts != 0) {
ERROR("proxy_request: osip_message_to_str failed");
return STS_FAILURE;
@@ -910,7 +910,7 @@
}
}
- sts = osip_message_to_str(response, &buffer);
+ sts = osip_message_to_str(response, &buffer, strlen(buffer));
if (sts != 0) {
ERROR("proxy_response: osip_message_to_str failed");
return STS_FAILURE;
@@ -966,7 +966,7 @@
}
}
- sts = osip_body_to_str(body, &bodybuff);
+ sts = osip_body_to_str(body, &bodybuff, strlen(&bodybuff));
sts = sdp_message_init(&sdp);
sts = sdp_message_parse (sdp, bodybuff);
osip_free(bodybuff);
@@ -981,7 +981,7 @@
{ /* just dump the buffer */
char *tmp, *tmp2;
sts = osip_message_get_body(mymsg, 0, &body);
- sts = osip_body_to_str(body, &tmp);
+ sts = osip_body_to_str(body, &tmp, strlen(tmp));
osip_content_length_to_str(mymsg->content_length, &tmp2);
DEBUG("Body before rewrite (clen=%s, strlen=%i):\n%s\n----",
tmp2, strlen(tmp), tmp);
@@ -1210,7 +1210,7 @@
sdp_message_free(sdp);
/* include new body */
- osip_message_set_body(mymsg, bodybuff);
+ osip_message_set_body(mymsg, bodybuff, strlen(bodybuff));
/* free content length resource and include new one*/
osip_content_length_free(mymsg->content_length);
@@ -1225,7 +1225,7 @@
{ /* just dump the buffer */
char *tmp, *tmp2;
sts = osip_message_get_body(mymsg, 0, &body);
- sts = osip_body_to_str(body, &tmp);
+ sts = osip_body_to_str(body, &tmp, strlen(&tmp));
osip_content_length_to_str(mymsg->content_length, &tmp2);
DEBUG("Body after rewrite (clen=%s, strlen=%i):\n%s\n----",
tmp2, strlen(tmp), tmp);
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/siproxd-0.5.10/src/register.c ./src/register.c
--- ../tmp-orig/siproxd-0.5.10/src/register.c 2005-01-08 11:05:12.000000000
+0100
+++ ./src/register.c 2005-03-22 16:53:57.293874812 +0100
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@
}
}
- sts = osip_message_to_str(response, &buffer);
+ sts = osip_message_to_str(response, &buffer, strlen(&buffer));
if (sts != 0) {
ERROR("register_response: msg_2char failed");
return STS_FAILURE;
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/siproxd-0.5.10/src/sip_utils.c ./src/sip_utils.c
--- ../tmp-orig/siproxd-0.5.10/src/sip_utils.c 2005-01-08 11:05:13.000000000
+0100
+++ ./src/sip_utils.c 2005-03-22 16:54:44.297798071 +0100
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@
}
}
- sts = osip_message_to_str(response, &buffer);
+ sts = osip_message_to_str(response, &buffer, strlen(&buffer));
if (sts != 0) {
ERROR("sip_gen_response: msg_2char failed");
return STS_FAILURE;
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/siproxd-0.5.10/src/siproxd.c ./src/siproxd.c
--- ../tmp-orig/siproxd-0.5.10/src/siproxd.c 2005-01-08 11:41:46.000000000
+0100
+++ ./src/siproxd.c 2005-03-22 16:51:10.871011947 +0100
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@
* Proxy Behavior - Request Validation - Reasonable Syntax
* (parse the received message)
*/
- sts=osip_message_parse(ticket.sipmsg, buff);
+ sts=osip_message_parse(ticket.sipmsg, buff, strlen(buff));
if (sts != 0) {
ERROR("osip_message_parse() failed... this is not good");
DUMP_BUFFER(-1, buff, i);
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 300938-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 May 2005 15:11:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 03 08:11:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from outbound.mailhop.org [63.208.196.171] (mailnull)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DSz39-0003W8-00; Tue, 03 May 2005 08:11:03 -0700
Received: from pool-68-238-242-169.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([68.238.242.169]
helo=mirrorlynx.com)
by outbound.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.44)
id 1DSz38-0003zG-KJ
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 03 May 2005 11:11:02 -0400
Received: from dan (helo=localhost)
by mirrorlynx.com with local-esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1DSz5v-0004xd-UX
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 03 May 2005 11:13:56 -0400
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 11:13:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: Dan Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: siproxd
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mirrorlynx.com)
X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS.org
X-Originating-IP: 68.238.242.169
X-Report-Abuse-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (see
http://www.mailhop.org/outbound/abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: DanWeber1
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,ONEWORD autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
NMU approved.
Dan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
