On 28/06/07 at 11:49 +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: > Package: workrave > Followup-For: Bug #421366 > > If the abovementioned behaviour is indeed caused by a failure in > workrave and not the work of an extremely bad coincidence, then the > severity of this report should be ‘grave’. It is well possible, however, > that it is another matter entirely, in which case a new report should be > file and the severity of this report remains at ‘important’. (The > severity ‘serious’ is not appropriate in either case.)
Hi, Diffing the packages list: 5,6c5,6 < ii libc6 2.5-9+b1 < ii libcairo2 1.4.6-1.1 --- > ii libc6 2.5-11 > ii libcairo2 1.4.10-1 9c9 < ii libgcc1 1:4.2-20070609-1 --- > ii libgcc1 1:4.2-20070627-1 30c30 < ii libpanel-applet2-0 2.18.2-1 --- > ii libpanel-applet2-0 2.18.2-2 35c35 < ii libstdc++6 4.2-20070609-1 --- > ii libstdc++6 4.2-20070627-1 I'll try to upgrade those packages. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
