whatever is easiest. i am happy with semidef_prog having either license.
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
* Lieven Vandenberghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-06 09:13]:
I can see why our license is ambiguous. When we wrote it in 1994, we
intended it to mean that the program is entirely free, for any purpose
(including commercial) and without any restriction.
If it is easier if we switch to a standard free license, I would choose
the LGPL.
Thanks for your reply.
As regards the Debian package, the best situation would be that you do a new
release of the software with the changed license. If you are not willing to
do it because semidef_prog is already old software and not maintained
anymore, I will release a new version of the package stating that it is
released now under the LGPL (if Stephen Boyd agrees, of course) and will add
the URL of this bug report discussion [1].
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/435214
Best regards,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]