Your message dated Wed, 08 Aug 2007 13:39:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393417: Reopening because not fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: uw-imap
Version: 7:2002edebian1-13
Severity: serious

Hi!

This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".

It seems this source package contains the following files from the
IETF under non-free license terms:

imap-2002e/docs/rfc/rfc3502.txt 
imap-2002e/docs/rfc/rfc2971.txt 
imap-2002e/docs/rfc/rfc1731.txt 
imap-2002e/docs/rfc/rfc1732.txt 
imap-2002e/docs/rfc/rfc1733.txt 
imap-2002e/docs/rfc/rfc3501.txt 
imap-2002e/docs/rfc/rfc2061.txt 
imap-2002e/docs/rfc/rfc2062.txt 
imap-2002e/docs/rfc/rfc2086.txt 
imap-2002e/docs/rfc/rfc2087.txt 
imap-2002e/docs/rfc/rfc2088.txt 
imap-2002e/docs/rfc/rfc2177.txt 
imap-2002e/docs/rfc/rfc2180.txt 
imap-2002e/docs/rfc/rfc2192.txt 
imap-2002e/docs/rfc/rfc2193.txt 
imap-2002e/docs/rfc/rfc2195.txt 
imap-2002e/docs/rfc/rfc2221.txt 
imap-2002e/docs/rfc/rfc2222.txt 
imap-2002e/docs/rfc/rfc2245.txt 
imap-2002e/docs/rfc/rfc2342.txt 
imap-2002e/docs/rfc/rfc2234.txt 
imap-2002e/docs/rfc/rfc2359.txt 
imap-2002e/docs/rfc/rfc2683.txt 
imap-2002e/docs/rfc/rfc2595.txt 
imap-2002e/docs/rfc/rfc3348.txt 
imap-2002e/docs/rfc/rfc3503.txt 
imap-2002e/docs/rfc/rfc3516.txt 

The license on RFC/I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see:
 * http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810
 * http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation
 * http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments

The etch release policy says binary and source packages must each be free:
 * http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt

The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy:
 * http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg

There are (at least) three ways to fix this problem.  In order of
preference:

1. Ask the author of the RFC to re-license the RFC under a free
   license.  A template for this e-mail request can be found at
   http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments

2. Remove the non-free material from the source, e.g., by re-packaging
   the upstream archive and adding a 'dfsg' version name to it.

3. Move the package to non-free.

I went over many packages looking for names of likely non-free files,
and there may be false positives.  If this is the case for your
package, I'm sorry for the noise.  I'll modify the scripts to take
into account false positives when I learn of them, and publish the
list of exceptions under "Known exceptions" at
<http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments>.

Thanks,
Simon


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: uw-imap
Source-Version: 7:2006f.dfsg-1

Simon Josefsson skrev:
> found 393417 7:2002edebian1-13.2
> reopen 393417
> thanks
> 
> The files are still present as far as I can tell.  Or am I looking at
> the wrong version or something?  This is from current unstable:

Yes, I believe you looked in the wrong place: It was closed in
*experimental*, and a fixed package has not yet appeared in unstable.

If I understand the BTS correctly, you did right with your "found"
statement above, but the "reopen" statement was wrong: Notice the last
paragraph on "reopen" here: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control

(reopen is an old command - I imagine in modern times it "unflags" all
"closed" flags, versioned or not)



Kind regards,

 - Jonas

-- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to