Hello Steve, On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 05:00:16PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 04:41:50PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > * Use linux-libc-dev now as build dependency (instead of > > linux-kernel-headers) > > This, though, is a bug, because linux-kernel-headers and linux-libc-dev are > both virtually build-essential (dependencies of libc6.1-dev). :) The > correct fix is to just drop this entry from the build-deps. I've just > committed this change now.
Ok, thanks for spotting. > > I think you should upload our changes now. Since I am no kernel developer, > > I cannot really judge some of your/upstream changes, so I leave it up > > to you whether you upload to experimental or unstable (depends on the > > pressure from 2.6.23 as well, of course). > > I would prefer to get someone to proactively test it with 2.6.23 before > uploading to the archive, to save on round-trips if the current patch > doesn't actually fix the PT_LOAD bug. But if nothing else, I'll upload it > when 2.6.23 becomes available in unstable and I've had a chance to test it > myself... That's why I thought to upload to experimental - no automatic update but (easier) possibility for testers. And aboot needs no autobuilders, so port considerations are moot. > > I have more changes (mostly in the documentatian/build area) in the > > pipeline, I will see if I've time next weekend. > > > Thanks for your swift help on getting aboot in shape again! > > N/p, thanks for keeping an eye on its status. :) Sure, after I've finally got (remote) access to an alpha again. Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature