On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 03:45:50PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > tag 439931 - confirmed > thanks
(I don't understand why you un-confirm 439931; it looks like a valid and reproducible bug to me) > Hello, did you see #439931 too? I did not check, but I guess that re-adding the old 64-egf-speedup.patch should fix it. Also patches 66-match_icase.patch and 67-w.patch should be considered. These patches tend to be quite long and hard to maintain. I did not check if they apply cleanly or not, or even if they were already applied upstream (based on the result of the test suite, I'm just guessing that they may still be needed). Kind Regards, -- Nekral -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
