On 10/1/07, Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No. This issue is completely valid. > > The .la file shipped with libsword-dev references libcurl.la. > Indeed, and that's the one I looked at when filing this bugreport:
Well, you didn't mention it in the bugreport. All you mentioned was the output of a faulty libtool. > > Instead of adding a dependency, a better fix would be to fix the .la > > file to not include the reference to libcurl.la if it is not needed. > That's another way. But there's definitely a problem on libsword-dev > AFAICT. The .la file is broken. It lists a lot of dependencies that aren't really needed, which can be verified by looking at the header files. After talking about this in IRC with Julian Cristau and Steve Langasek, we came to the conclusion that the best solution for this problem might be to just stop shipping the .la file. -- Besos, Marga -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
