Hi Quanah, On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 04:51:14PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > To answer your first question, the 64 bit patch was in response to:
> <http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Build?id=3691> > I'm curious what you think is incorrect about that particular patch. I simply don't know that it's necessary once the root cause of Debian bug #304549 is addressed. Doubling the stack size for 64-bit archs is fine, but at least in my 64-bit tests, slapd works fine once the library linkage is fixed so that slapd threads actually *get* the requested 4MB stack instead of a default 2MB one. If this patch is known to fix a real problem, and not merely supposed to fix one, then by all means it should be added. > As for the serious issue in 2.2.23, it is not addressed by any of my posted > patches, they address other issues. > It was pulled in 2.2.25: > OpenLDAP 2.2.25 Release > Removed broken libldap fast synchronous search result processing > (ITS#3612) The bug log suggests that this problem is specific to 2.2.24, which we're not shipping. (We're shipping 2.2.23.) -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
