Your message dated Fri, 13 May 2005 17:16:55 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ifupdown: missing versioned Dependency on initscripts (>= 
2.85-15)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Apr 2005 08:45:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 01 00:45:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.mppmu.mpg.de [134.107.24.11] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DHHmj-0003uz-00; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:45:45 -0800
Received: by mail.mppmu.mpg.de (Postfix, from userid 1111)
        id 705D2BD49; Fri,  1 Apr 2005 10:45:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pcl246.mppmu.mpg.de (pcl246.mppmu.mpg.de [134.107.2.10])
        by mail.mppmu.mpg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC80BD47
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri,  1 Apr 2005 10:45:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by pcl246.mppmu.mpg.de (Postfix, from userid 5055)
        id 00DB675DF; Fri,  1 Apr 2005 10:45:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by pcl246.mppmu.mpg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D9975DE
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri,  1 Apr 2005 10:45:13 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:45:13 +0200 (CEST)
From: Stefan Kluth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Stefan Kluth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ifupdown: postinst fails if /dev/shm/network/ does not exist
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


Subject: ifupdown: postinst fails if /dev/shm/network/ does not exist
Package: ifupdown
Version: 0.6.4-4.12
Severity: important

*** Please type your report below this line ***
after the canocical apt-get update; apt-get upgrade ifupdown fails
like this:

Setting up ifupdown (0.6.4-4.12) ...
ifupdown.postinst: Error: The canonical path of /etc/network/run could
not be determined. Aborting.
dpkg: error processing ifupdown (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
 Errors were encountered while processing:
  ifupdown

After googling for a few minutes I found that

$ mkdir /dev/shm/network

fixes the problem:

$ dpkg --configure --pending
Setting up ifupdown (0.6.4-4.12) ...

Cheers, Stefan

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.22-xfs
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages ifupdown depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]       1.4.30.11    Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  net-tools                   1.60-10      The NET-3 networking toolkit

-- debconf information:
  ifupdown/convert-interfaces: true

---Stefan Kluth, PhD----------Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter-----------
-  MPI fuer Physik         -  phone:  +49 89 32354 468  -      OPAL&  -
-  Foehringer Ring 6       -  fax:    +49 89 32354 305  -      ATLAS  -
---D-80805 Munich, Germany----e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 302519-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 May 2005 00:16:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 13 17:16:56 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) 
[66.93.39.86] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DWkKu-0000l3-00; Fri, 13 May 2005 17:16:56 -0700
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 11D1A172CDB; Fri, 13 May 2005 17:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 17:16:55 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ifupdown: missing versioned Dependency on initscripts (>= 2.85-15)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DKU6Jbt7q3WqK7+M"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--DKU6Jbt7q3WqK7+M
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

ifupdown 0.6.7 has been accepted into testing, so it appears this bug is
fixed.

Thanks,
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

--DKU6Jbt7q3WqK7+M
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFChUNpKN6ufymYLloRAhsaAKCev54MiXFEhwGH0ISDq6X4pN/lkwCfekyB
S23LpboJA3m3zHteHA9urN8=
=VuVl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--DKU6Jbt7q3WqK7+M--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to