reopen 453080 reassign 453080 myspell-de-at,hunspell-de-at found 453080 20070829-1 tag 453080 + confirmed thanks
Hi, Roland Ambrosch wrote: > thanks for your fast answers. > I tried figuring out where I got these versions from and my apt-cacher > tells that I have them from ftp.at.debian.org/testing. The problem came up > because these packages don't depend on myspell-de-de. Indeed, I didn't check again since I knew that I added the depends but it got removed by Roland in 20070829-1. Roland, can you explain why exactly? What is "in the past"? We should not care about old (< etch) hunspells... With this change you broke openoffice.org, because it tried to load a dictionary which is not existing ans Xulrunner/Ice*/enchant will not be able to use it too I guess. Indeed, there is no de_AT.aff in myspell-de-at at all... (de-AT.aff is uninteresting for OOo but would be broken to since it's a symlink to de_AT.aff). The OOo info file references de_AT, though and Xulrunner/Iice* will also expect a working de-AT.aff: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/myspell/dicts$ cat ../infos/ooo/myspell-de-at DICT de AT de_AT > Is it a problem with the mirror? > > myspell-de-at: > Installed: 20070829-3 > Candidate: 20070829-3 No, it's fine. It just that you reported a bug against *openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at* which is *NOT* a real package in Debian (but there once, at woody/sarge development times one, so I got confused - ans I didn't really look at the version number, my bad, sorry) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature