Paul, you might want to talk to Hubert Chathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> about this, or alternatively the Debian GNUstep maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 11:51:14PM +0930, Paul Wise wrote: > I've been talking to upstream about adopting this package This is only useful if you intend to package OGO, otherwise it should be removed from the archive along with the fork of the GNU ObjC runtime (IMVHO). > > > [Summary: gnustep-make2 should live in a gnustep-make2 package, not > > > in gnustep-make1, this has potential to break a lot more software] That would be a lot of burden for the Debian maintainer for no real gain. The changes needed for the Debian GNUstep packages are entirely trivial. It is true that GNUstep Make 2.0 and 1.x are incompatible, but only a few of the GNUstep packages in Debian needed patches to the upstream code (all of them needed adjustments for the debian files). In general, properly written GNUmakefile's work with both versions. (For libFoundation things are more complicated -- but adopting it to 2.0 should be fairly easy, if not already done upstream.) > > There don't seem to have been any bugs filed about this change, I > > guess not many GNUStep folks/developers use Debian sid. There shouldn't be bugs filed (at least when we complete the transition). Everything is working as expected as far as the build system is concerned. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
