On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 09:53:40AM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 11:56:54PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > dpkg-shlibdeps became stricter, causing wine to FTBFS on amd64: > > > > [...] > > dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: no dependency information found for > > /usr/lib32/libxml2.so.2 (used by debian/libwine/usr/lib/wine/msxml3.dll.so). > > dh_shlibdeps: command returned error code 512 > > make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1 > > dpkg-buildpackage: failure: fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch gave error > > exit status 2 > > Yes this is odd. What are we supposed to do to fix it, put the libs > directly to /lib32 and /usr/lib32 instead of /emul? > > Why does dpkg-shlibdeps not honour symlinks anymore in the first place?
I think it's not about symlinks. From dpkg-shlibdeps: if ($libobj->is_public_library() and not add_shlibs_dep($soname, $pkg)) { [abort message here] so what we're missing is an shlibs file then? -- Robert Millan <GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call! <DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak? (as seen on /.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]