Your message dated Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:36:58 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug #454445 is fixed in libaqbanking 2.3.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Source: libaqbanking
Version: 2.3.3-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Aqbanking-devel] Debit notes
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:20:32 +0100
From: Customer-Service 2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: OPTLECTRA GmbH - The Laser Company -
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I just installed aqbanking-tool and experience a problem when I try
to submit debit notes.

/usr/bin/aqbanking-tool debitnote --bank=xxxxxxxx --account=xxxxxxx -
-rbank=xxxxx --raccount=xxxxxx --rname="XXXX" --value="100,00:EUR" --
purpose="RE 123 KU 123"

 From this command I get the error: /usr/bin/aqbanking-tool: symbol
lookup error: /usr/bin/aqbanking-tool: undefined symbol:
AB_Transaction_FillLocalFromAccount

Can anybody tell me, what I do wrong? I am using Version 2.3.3-1 from
the Debian package

Thanks in advance for any help

Werner
_______________________________________________
Aqbanking-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aqbanking-devel



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libaqbanking
Version: 3.0.0-1

Micha Lenk schrieb:
> Source: libaqbanking
> Version: 2.3.3-2
> 
> Why ever, the BTS apparently believes that this bug isn't closed yet.
> This is another try to make it believe different. ;)

Apparently the BTS doesn't know about a version 2.3.3-2 in the version
history. Hence it ignores the closing completely. Weird...

Hence I close it in version 3.0.0-1, the next version known to the BTS
after 2.3.3-1.

Micha


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to