Hi Ian, t On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 03:53:22PM +0200, Roderich Schupp wrote: > Package: ghc6 > Version: 6.6.1-2 > Severity: normal > > Trying to build ghc6 with gcc-4.2 as gcc results in: > > ... > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > == /usr/bin/make all -wr -f Makefile; > in /var/tmp/build/stuff/ghc6-6.6.1/libraries/base > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ../../compiler/ghc-inplace -H16m -O -fglasgow-exts -cpp -Iinclude > -"#include" HsBase.h -funbox-strict-fields -package-name base-2.1.1 > -O -Rghc-timing -fgenerics -fgenerics -split-objs -c > Data/Typeable.hs-boot -o Data/Typeable.o-boot -ohi > Data/Typeable.hi-boot > <<ghc: 15624572 bytes, 5 GCs, 98272/98272 avg/max bytes residency (1 > samples), 18M in use, 0.00 INIT (0.00 elapsed), 0.11 MUT (1.09 > elapsed), 0.02 GC (0.04 elapsed) :ghc>> > ../../compiler/ghc-inplace -H16m -O -fglasgow-exts -cpp -Iinclude > -"#include" HsBase.h -funbox-strict-fields -package-name base-2.1.1 > -O -Rghc-timing -fgenerics -fgenerics -split-objs -c > Data/Dynamic.hs-boot -o Data/Dynamic.o-boot -ohi Data/Dynamic.hi-boot > <<ghc: 11938524 bytes, 4 GCs, 98224/98224 avg/max bytes residency (1 > samples), 18M in use, 0.01 INIT (0.00 elapsed), 0.06 MUT (0.36 > elapsed), 0.03 GC (0.03 elapsed) :ghc>> > ../../compiler/ghc-inplace -H16m -O -fglasgow-exts -cpp -Iinclude > -"#include" HsBase.h -funbox-strict-fields -package-name base-2.1.1 > -O -Rghc-timing -fgenerics -fgenerics -split-objs -c > GHC/Err.lhs-boot -o GHC/Err.o-boot -ohi GHC/Err.hi-boot > <<ghc: 18035540 bytes, 5 GCs, 99228/99228 avg/max bytes residency (1 > samples), 18M in use, 0.01 INIT (0.00 elapsed), 0.12 MUT (0.59 > elapsed), 0.03 GC (0.03 elapsed) :ghc>> > ../../compiler/ghc-inplace -H16m -O -fglasgow-exts -cpp -Iinclude > -"#include" HsBase.h -funbox-strict-fields -package-name base-2.1.1 > -O -Rghc-timing -fgenerics -fgenerics -split-objs -c GHC/Base.lhs > -o GHC/Base.o -ohi GHC/Base.hi > GHC/Base_split/.o::Base(void):(.data+0x0): multiple definition of > `base_GHCziBase_zeze_closure' > GHC/Base_split/Base__1.o:(.data+0x0): first defined here > GHC/Base_split/.o::Base(void): In function `base_GHCziBase_zeze_info': > ghc14747_0.hc:(.text+0xc): multiple definition of `base_GHCziBase_zeze_info' > GHC/Base_split/Base__1.o:ghc14747_0.hc:(.text+0xc): first defined here > GHC/Base_split/Base__3.o:(.data+0x0): multiple definition of > `base_GHCziBase_zeze_closure' > GHC/Base_split/Base__1.o:(.data+0x0): first defined here > GHC/Base_split/Base__3.o: In function `base_GHCziBase_zeze_info': > ghc14747_0.hc:(.text+0xc): multiple definition of `base_GHCziBase_zeze_info' > GHC/Base_split/Base__1.o:ghc14747_0.hc:(.text+0xc): first defined here > [more of the same elided] > > The reason is that the split markers (__STG_SPLIT_MARKER in > includes/Stg.h) that the ghc compiler inserts into > C code are emitted differently into assembler with gcc-4.1 and gcc-4.2. > The latter seems to kind of delay them, so part of actual assembler code > is now before the first emitted split marker, which then is erroneously > taken as prologue material and copied into every split assembler source > resulting in lots of duplicate definitions. > > As a temporary workaround, a build with --with-gcc=gcc-4.1 succeeds. >
This bug seems to be fixed in newer versions according to upstream's track: could you update the package? Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
