On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 05:32:03PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > Hi all,
Hi, > I do understand that derivative distributions such as Ubuntu do put > their own release entries in there. I imagine the Ubuntu users > understand that and can differentiate the Ubuntu release from the > Debian one in some fashion. However, I think that the "pure" > Debian changelog should include only entries for Debian releases. I agree with you in the principle. As a principle, I do not find that strange if things actually go differently. Anyway I have not any strong preference, feel free to modify things at you wish. > By the way, I notice that entry is targeted at experimental; what is > the plan here? This fix looks fine for unstable, no? Are you > planning some further not-for-unstable modifications? Experimental because agreement for unstable has still to be found with RMs, Boost is again in the middle of a transition. I am hereby asking RMs their advice. cheers, Domenico -----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok --[ http://www.dandreoli.com/gpgkey.asc ---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
