Hi Ana, Ana Guerrero schrieb am Sat 12. Jan, 18:52 (+0100): > On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:55:14PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Package: xindy > > version: 2.2~beta2-3 > > Severity: serious > > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs > > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > > > > Hi, > > > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > > amd64. > > > > Relevant part: > > > > > make[2]: Entering directory `/build/user/xindy-2.2~beta2/rte/ordrules' > > > clisp -q -norc -c ordrulei.lsp > > > ;; Compiling file /build/user/xindy-2.2~beta2/rte/ordrules/ordrulei.lsp > > ... > > > ;; Wrote file /build/user/xindy-2.2~beta2/rte/ordrules/ordrulei.fas > > > ;; Wrote file /build/user/xindy-2.2~beta2/rte/ordrules/ordrulei.c > > > 0 errors, 0 warnings > > > make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/user/xindy-2.2~beta2/rte/ordrules' > > > clisp-link add-module-set ordrules /usr/lib/clisp/full tmp > > > /usr/bin/clisp-link: No link kit found in /usr/lib/clisp/linkkit > > > make[1]: *** [tmp] Error 1 > > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/user/xindy-2.2~beta2/rte' > > > make: *** [build-arch-stamp] Error 1 > > > dpkg-buildpackage: failure: /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary gave > > error exit status 2 > > > > > This seems to be a problem with clisp-dev because the path > /usr/lib/clisp does not exist anymore, and it needs to be replaced by > /usr/lib/clisp-2.43.
Yes. I've mailed the maintainer of clisp privately, if this was his intend and if he can provide a link /usr/lib/clisp, but he didn't answer. Now, I'm working on packaging the new release of Xindy. But I'm currently very busy. Bye, Jörg. -- Der Klügere gibt so lange nach bis er der Dumme ist.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
