On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 06:54:47PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > It simple rebuild would still break partial upgrades.
Yes, I agree. I don't think rebuilding the reverse dependencies is the right solution. The changelog suggests that the ABI change is un-necessary (it was an attempt to fix a problem on windows). We could just revert the change, but that would mean we had a different ABI from other distributions. I'm not sure what the best solution is here. What if anything have other distros done? > Is it clear at all yet whether the ABI breakage is in the C++ wrapper > libpcrecpp0 or in the main library? Yes, it's in the C++ wrapper. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
