On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 04:05:02PM +0000, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:45:45 +0100 > Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 10:03:48AM +0000, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo > > wrote: > > > I noticed in the other bug report it was asked to include an > > > ltrace... This is the ltrace of an svn update. > > > > > > > You had libc6-dbg installed when you ran it ? because I see no > > libc calls which is odd. A strace may help too please. > > I installed -dgb on purpose... unfortunately I can't test with > older libc6 (I don't have them anymore) and well nothing has changed > other than that upgrade. > > There are other stuff in the last upgrade of that box... but they do > look even less related.
well, the point is ltrace barely uses the libc, so it's really curious. > I've tried to use svn clients from other different hosts on the same > server and everything is working... this exclude a corruption in the > svn repo and should exclude a network problems on the server. Well, it could be network related for all I know, but I see nothing interesting in the strace :/ -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgpRwA3briCx5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
