-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Am So den  2. Mär 2008 um  1:03 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> > The problem still exists. The package is unbuildable (with the build
> > dependencies in the package). Maybe you miss some of them?
> 
> Nope???

[...]

> > which is the default in stable. (This is the reason why I need to
> > recompile it as you did compile it with a glibc which is not
> > compatible with stable (2.4) kernel.)
> 
> ??? but I didn't catch the rebuild happened on stable (although one
> might have induced it from the APT pinning, but stating explicitely
> the build environment is always preferred, i.e. at least suite +
> arch).

So if a package need a special build environment that should be handled
by the right dependencies. If only the gcc (for example) in sid or
experimental can be used to build the software there has to be a
versioned dependency for.

> Note that I'm not the maintainer of the package, I was just walking
> the list of RC bugs.

Ok. So let's see what the maintainer is thinking about.

> I'm not sure how to handle such a bug, anyway.

Having versioned build dependency for the build part which is not new
enough in etch?

> Let's tag it ???etch???, that should do the trick, so that it no
> longer appears on the list of RC bugs for the next release, and so
> that people working on fixing RC bugs on stable can identify it at
> first glance (but I guess people are more actively working on fixing
> RC bugs for the next stable release).

Well, so it will stay RC for the current release. And the problem might
be also happen in future with wrong dependencies in the next release
too. There might be different build environment in sid and
frozen/testing that might the bug hit again.

Regards
   Klaus
- -- 
Klaus Ethgen                            http://www.ethgen.de/
pub  2048R/D1A4EDE5 2000-02-26 Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fingerprint: D7 67 71 C4 99 A6 D4 FE  EA 40 30 57 3C 88 26 2B
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBR8pwP5+OKpjRpO3lAQIvPwf/XgTCmhZsGx/MSHEWHdIeaLJ1aP4raPsk
pF7pHDfdZMtay+UFXekgAus59zZcdp1C+8Oa6VCEOTniOFuDHLdUqpr00wLs8TcR
g4Pg+kwqemU3/Kx2bsMSyqNryUj98fAKw/FbCyJJZ+H2PqSnlTWe++dO6E1KhEaG
H5zrGxQ/E8HP9ZcKsrkAh3wEkWBrJCksWjsreeRKajWZKFkJy8m/tNonTpzO/J4j
8vNcySJJsojkgjBCXbg4GkYdjseHNLA8SZ2P4L9+emImn70Ueeh7lFWhS+GiYov+
HUO0QSM8+MPeW9H7CB7o94uj+wnCRpggSq9KRHg7kQWSqWArOXAm0A==
=Io1j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to