Hi Bernhard, * Bernhard R. Link <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-06 12:13]: > * Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080304 15:07]: > * Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080305 12:54]: > > I don't think its a user mistake if rxvt does not return a > > message that DISPLAY is not set and uses a "random" one > > instead. > > I think a random one would be more harmless. This way it is a > predictable, so any user (even daemon or nobody) can just open :0 > and wait for connections as long as no :0 is already running.
Sorry if that was not clear, that's why I put the quotes around the word random. By the way, we are currently discussing[0] this issue on: http://oss-security.openwall.org/wiki/mailinglists, if you have time feel free to join the discussion. > P.S: you only wrote your mail to the bug, not to the submitter, so > I only accidentially saw it. (Now I subscribed, so I will get them). Ah sorry, usually I hit group-reply, happens to many bugs to cope with... [0] http://marc.info/?t=120464358500002&r=1&w=2 Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
pgp9vrZT6NZsI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
