Hi, David Koo wrote: > > I disagree, sorry. But it doesn't really matter anyway, see below. > > I'm embarrased to say but I agree with your tests now. This morning I > gave it one more shot and renamed the arphic directory back to its > original name and openoffice started up!
With 1:2.3.1-5 or sids 2.4? Did you change something on your system except moving that dir back? > I supposed the bug severity can be lowered (or even closed) now that > it seems to be running fine! Well, if the bug is reproducible in 1:2.3.1-5 still not. The bug is marked as found in 2.3.1-5 only so for the BTS it doesn't apply to the 2.4 series anyway.. If you can't reproduce it with 1:2.3.1-5 either, though, then yes, we can close it.. Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]