Your message dated Tue, 01 Apr 2008 09:46:52 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-bazaar-maint] Bug#471626: bzr-builddeb: FTBFS:
Unsatisfiable build-dependency: bzrtools: Depends: bzr (< 1.3~) but 1.3~rc1-1
is to be installed
has caused the Debian Bug report #471626,
regarding bzr-builddeb: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency: bzrtools:
Depends: bzr (< 1.3~) but 1.3~rc1-1 is to be installed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
471626: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=471626
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: bzr-builddeb
Version: 0.92
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080318 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.37.2), python-all (>= 2.3.5-11), python-apt
> Build-Depends-Indep: bzr (>= 0.92~), python-central (>= 0.5.8),
> python-docutils, python-debian (>= 0.1.4), bzrtools (>= 0.92~), patchutils
> Checking for already installed source dependencies...
> debhelper: missing
> Using default version 6.0.9
> python-all: missing
> Using default version 2.4.4-6
> python-apt: missing
> bzr: missing
> Using default version 1.3~rc1-1
> python-central: missing
> Using default version 0.6.1
> python-docutils: missing
> python-debian: missing
> Using default version 0.1.9
> bzrtools: missing
> Using default version 1.2.0-1
> patchutils: missing
> Checking for source dependency conflicts...
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
> Reading state information...
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> bzrtools: Depends: bzr (< 1.3~) but 1.3~rc1-1 is to be installed
> E: Broken packages
The full build log is available from:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2008/03/18
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment. Internet was not accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 10:26 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: bzr-builddeb
> Version: 0.92
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080318 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Hi,
This was just a transient failure as the build dependencies came in to
sync, all should be fine now.
Thanks,
James
--- End Message ---
