tags 454872 -patch thanks
* Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080304 04:58]: > I know it's fixed-upstream, but anyway, here's a patch against the > current revision, because of the RG/RC-iness of this bug. While preparing an NMU based upon your patch, I found that it didn't work completly. After several lines of stuff like: - _ZNSt8_Rb_treeIPKcSt4pairIKS1_PKN5Spiff20SpiffExtensionReaderEESt10_Select1stIS8_ENS4_7Toolbox18SpiffStringCompareESaIS8_EE9_M_insertEPSt18_Rb_tree_node_base0 +#MISSING: 0.8.2-2.1# _ZNSt8_Rb_treeIPKcSt4pairIKS1_PKN5Spiff20SpiffExtensionReaderEESt10_Select1stIS8_ENS4_7Toolbox18SpiffStringCompareESaIS8_EE9_M_insertEPSt0 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.8.2-2.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.8.0 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.8.0 +#MISSING: 0.8.2-2.1# [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.8.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.8.0 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.8.0 +#MISSING: 0.8.2-2.1# _ZNSt8_Rb_treeIPKcSt4pairIKS1_PcESt10_Select1stIS5_EN5Spiff7Toolbox18SpiffStringCompareESaIS5_EE9_M_insertEPSt18_Rb_tree_node_baseSE_RKS50 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.8.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.8.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.8.0 I get the following error: dh_makeshlibs: command returned error code 256 Perhaps the new upstream version should be packaged? Yours sincerely, Alexander
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
