clone 477168 -1 -2 reassign -1 iceape reassign -2 icedove thanks Mike Hommey wrote: > How come iceape didn't fail to build but had a warning instead ? (using > gcc 4.3)
Correct. g*cc* 4.3, not g*++*-4.3. What you compile is C++ file using c++, though, so what gets used is g++. If you looked at the top buildlog you would have seen that it was built on mundy (while xulrunner was built on caballero): Automatic build of iceape_1.1.9-2 on mundy by sbuild/ia64 98 Build started at 20080419-1251 [...] Toolchain package versions: libc6.1-dev_2.7-8 gcc-4.3_4.3.0-3 g++-4.3_ binutils_2.18.1~cvs20080103-4 libstdc++6-4.3-dev_ libstdc++6_4.3.0-3 [...] Note the non-mentioning of a g++ 4.3 and libstdc++6-4.3-dev version. -> inconsistent chroot, I guess it used g++ 4.2 then which of course works In contrast to this, xulrunner from caballero: [...] Toolchain package versions: libc6.1-dev_2.7-10 gcc-4.3_4.3.0-3 g++-4.3_4.3.0-3 binutils_2.18.1~cvs20080103-4 libstdc++6-4.3-dev_4.3.0-3 libstdc++6_4.3.0-3 [...[ So if mundy had a proper chroot, iceape (and icdeove) would have failed there, too... (CC'ing lamont) Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
