* Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-24 17:10:36 +0200]: > severity 477454 serious > thanks > > Hi, > > I don't think we should release with that kind of code in Debian - what > Kindergarten games does upstream want to play with us here? No, that > should be fixed and the fix is pretty easy and forward.
I don't really see that this issue is serious enough to warrant repacking the upstream tarball, and patching the binary package doesn't seem to achieve anything either, since the only way someone would see this is if they went looking. What exactly is your proposed solution here? I also very much doubt this is the only instance of profanity in the source code of packages in Debian (grep the Linux kernel source for "colourful" words sometime), so I'm not sure why this is such a big issue. To the best of my knowledge, the next upstream release will not contain this particular code snippet anyway, but that's probably still quite a long way off given the activity that's happening in upstream svn. -- mithrandi, i Ainil en-Balandor, a faer Ambar
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
