reassign 476976 scons
thanks

sorry, will need another rebuild with 0.6.6 (or you remove the
directory manually). Will upload python-central tonight.

Mark Brown writes:
> reassign python-central
> kthxbye
> 
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 06:51:00PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > reopen 476976
> > found 476976 0.98.2-1
> > thanks
> > 
> > Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (25/04/2008):
> > > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> > > which was filed against the scons package:
> > > 
> > > #476976: scons: Doesn't work at all
> > > 
> > > It has been closed by Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> > 
> > | Changes: 
> > |  scons (0.98.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
> > |  .
> > |    * New upstream release.
> > |    * Build against new python-central, picking up new generated code which
> > |      fixes upgrades (closes: #476976).
> > 
> > Hmm, no, the upgrade isn't fixed.
> > 
> > Context:
> > --------
> > It started with my wondering whether I was hitting a regression in
> > scons, which you can trigger by trying to build blender in a clean sid 
> > environment.  AFAIUI by reading the diff, the Options->Variables
> > transition is being initiated, being at the moment mostly transparent,
> > then it's planned to warn for deprecation, and then to remove that
> > compat layer completely.
> > 
> > While I'm perfectly OK with the above plan, it looks like that compat
> > layer just doesn't work.
> > | scons: Reading SConscript files ...
> > | ImportError: No module named BoolOption:
> > |   File "/home/kibi/hack/collab-maint/blender-2.45/SConstruct", line 44:
> > |     import tools.btools
> > |   File "/home/kibi/hack/collab-maint/blender-2.45/tools/btools.py", line 
> > 4:
> > |     import SCons.Options.BoolOption
> > | make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> > 
> > How I reproduced #476976:
> > -------------------------
> > Blender FTBFS with scons/0.98.2-1. Wondering which version was OK, I
> > downgraded scons to its testing version (0.98.0-1), which doesn't have
> > the Option->Variable transition, Blender built fine. Upgrading to the
> > sid version of scons again, Blender built fine again. And when purging
> > it:
> > | $ sudo dpkg -P scons
> > | (Reading database ... 26708 files and directories currently installed.)
> > | Removing scons ...
> > | dpkg - warning: while removing scons, directory `/usr/lib/scons/SCons' 
> > not empty so not removed.
> > | dpkg - warning: while removing scons, directory `/usr/lib/scons' not 
> > empty so not removed.
> > | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/hack/collab-maint/blender-2.45$ find /usr/lib/scons/
> > | /usr/lib/scons/
> > | /usr/lib/scons/SCons
> > | /usr/lib/scons/SCons/Options
> > | /usr/lib/scons/SCons/Options/EnumOption.pyc
> > | /usr/lib/scons/SCons/Options/ListOption.pyc
> > | /usr/lib/scons/SCons/Options/PathOption.pyc
> > | /usr/lib/scons/SCons/Options/__init__.pyc
> > | /usr/lib/scons/SCons/Options/BoolOption.pyc
> > | /usr/lib/scons/SCons/Options/PackageOption.pyc
> > 
> > All of this being in an uptodate i386 chroot; python-central is 0.6.5.
> > Maybe you'll need to embed a code snippet in a maintainer script to
> > clean the mess that previous python-central version(s) introduced/left
> > in your previously-uploaded scons packages?
> > 
> > Anyway, the above-mentioned regression deserves its own bugreport, which
> > is on its way.
> > 
> > Mraw,
> > KiBi.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to