-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:54:51PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:53:00PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> I'd be _very_ happy if you could make the 1.9 branch available in 
>> unstable.  But even in experimental it will get compiled for the 
>> popular architectures so is of some use for testing out this core 
>> Sugar activity.
>
>This won't happen before all rdeps of the current xulrunner in unstable 
>are ready for the transition. I hope this can happen before the end of 
>May.

Do I understand you correctly that your aim is only to _replace_ 1.8 
with 1.9? Isn't it possible to have them side by side (with clashing 1.9 
package names renamed to -unstable or similar)?


  - Jonas

- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIF5zQn7DbMsAkQLgRAoxkAJ9fa8wUHS+dyjxeVLU33yKgsmuX2ACfUjDH
uc8MGnZ8b9fyA/42dUaV3ws=
=ghGj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to