-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:54:51PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: >On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:53:00PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> I'd be _very_ happy if you could make the 1.9 branch available in >> unstable. But even in experimental it will get compiled for the >> popular architectures so is of some use for testing out this core >> Sugar activity. > >This won't happen before all rdeps of the current xulrunner in unstable >are ready for the transition. I hope this can happen before the end of >May.
Do I understand you correctly that your aim is only to _replace_ 1.8 with 1.9? Isn't it possible to have them side by side (with clashing 1.9 package names renamed to -unstable or similar)? - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIF5zQn7DbMsAkQLgRAoxkAJ9fa8wUHS+dyjxeVLU33yKgsmuX2ACfUjDH uc8MGnZ8b9fyA/42dUaV3ws= =ghGj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]