On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 07:41:10PM +0000, Joe Nahmias wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 11:57:55PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > > Lets not complicate this matter with the age-long build/build-arch > > discussion. libtommath needs add the build-dependencies enough to > > to get through debian/rules build for the time being.
> Maybe I'm missing something [...] Yes. You missed the part where I requested not complicate the issue. dpkg-buildpackage/sbuild will be made better eventually. Will happen faster if someone actually shows a patch that uses build-arch and demonstrates that it will break building of <1% packages. Currently it seems people prefer to just talk about it and hypothise about problems that could potentially materialize in some parallax universe rather than provide patches and testresults of full archive rebuilds. So for now, no furious handwaving towards the policy/dpkg/sbuild etc is going to help your package a) getting built b) getting to testing/lenny.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
