On Monday 12 May 2008 05:14:15 Thomas Viehmann wrote: > I'm afraid that until someone fixes gnat-4.2, keeping it just for the > benefit of ghdl is not much of an option. With gnat-4.2 removal > imminent, I'm raising the severity.
I would like to get this fixed too, but so far I have not been able to get get GHDL to compile with gnat-4.3. I could revert to gnat-4.1, but this reintroduces several really annoying bugs into GHDL. So from GHDL's point of view, going back to gnat-4.1 is also "not much of an option". Does anyone want to volunteer to help? -- Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OpenPGP FP: 4135 2A3B 4726 ACC5 9094 0097 F0A9 8A4C 4CD6 E3D2
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
