On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Morten Werner Forsbring wrote:
==12662== Invalid read of size 1 ==12662== at 0x80778C8: (within /usr/sbin/cfagent) ==12662== by 0x8077A8A: (within /usr/sbin/cfagent) ==12662== by 0x807A48E: (within /usr/sbin/cfagent) ==12662== by 0x8053AC0: (within /usr/sbin/cfagent) ==12662== by 0x8053ECC: (within /usr/sbin/cfagent) ==12662== by 0x431A44F: (below main) (libc-start.c:222) ==12662== Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd ==12662== ==12662== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV) ==12662== Access not within mapped region at address 0x0
Hi, and sorry for this late reply. Have you tested if this is improved with 2.2.7-1 of cfengine?
I don't see it on the servers (amd64), but it persists on the client (x86-32) boxen - now with about the same regularity (ie, not every single run, but a couple times a day) - so much better than before :) The work clients get this: Jun 26 00:31:37 corkscrew kernel: cfagent[18939]: segfault at 0 ip 00000000 sp bff455bc error 4 in cfagent[8048000+b3000] Jun 26 01:01:46 corkscrew kernel: cfagent[24563]: segfault at 0 ip 00000000 sp bfd19b8c error 4 in cfagent[8048000+b3000] and Jun 25 17:31:21 gothic-ave kernel: cfagent[8895]: segfault at 1f201 ip 0001f201 sp bfe524ac error 4 in cfagent[8048000+b3000] Jun 25 18:01:37 gothic-ave kernel: cfagent[15938]: segfault at 1f201 ip 0001f201 sp bfb0a16c error 4 in cfagent[8048000+b3000] At home, I see this instead: Jun 26 00:31:21 sparks-ave kernel: cfagent[24499]: segfault at dbdbdbdb ip dbdbdbdb sp bfa5c0cc error 15 Jun 26 01:01:28 sparks-ave kernel: cfagent[27125]: segfault at dbdbdbdb ip dbdbdbdb sp bf830eac error 15 The shining light, if there is one is that they problems look to be always the same failure (address/ip) - looks to be a bad branch ? I can run a bit via valgrind if it'll help -- Rick Nelson * |Rain| prepares for polygon soup <|Rain|> sweet merciful crap, it works? * |Rain| faints -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
