"Michael K. Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Personally, I would retain them as a courtesy to upstream; users are > no more and no less free to modify or remove them than Debian is. > The alternative -- to demand that all content other than license > texts and other legal indicia must be arbitrarily modifiable in > order to be DFSG-free -- is logically consistent but would require > the removal of all remotely "artistic" or "polemical" works in the > Debian archive.
And for what it's worth, my eariler post on this topic still reflects my position fairly well. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]