At 01 Aug 2008 10:09:21 -0400, Camm Maguire wrote: > > Greetings, and thanks for the feedback! WOuld you mind excerpting the > C routines corresponding to the two 'no' results below, compile with > -g and run under gdb to let me know where they fail? I am surprised > at the failure. > > Specifically, what is wrong with > > void gprof_cleanup() {}; > int main(int argc,char *argv[],char *envp[]) { > #include "h/unrandomize.h" > return 0;} > > when compiled and run in the topdir of gcl source? Hi All;
I changed the debian bug followup to the GCL bug about sbrk; hope that makes sense. More context can be found in debian bug #474909 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=474909 The short answer to your question is no :-). I have the strangest situation: If I run './debian/rules build' then the configure completes successfully, and the build completes (although the test results at the end look pretty disastrous). Build log (i386, linux-image-2.6.25-2-686 2.6.25-7) is at http://www.cs.unb.ca/~bremner/logs/2008/08/02/rules-build.log.gz I am currently building gcl 2.6.7-40 in various permutations of environments, but based on the Changlelog I don't expect big differences. All the best, David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]