On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 07:26:38PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > But, in such an (unlikely) court battle the onus would be on them to > > prove that the stuff they committed was both copyrightable in the first > > place as well as not infringing on previous work (which they apparently > > didn't have any license to modify).
> Nope, without a license the contributor could ask for compensation per > copy that was distributed if the court would agree that he has copyright > on it and we didn't have permission to distribute it (which is not far > fetched at all without having a license...). As I said above... they could hardly claim copyright on modifications which they made without a license. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]