Hi,
so let us review the options here.
the diff is ~90 lines of code change (see below), with about half of
these (all of cache.c, some in sshfs.c, too) going into the caching fix
for a bug with potential file corruption and one part of the rest fixing
a protocol.
Options for lenny might be
- stay at 2.0,
- pick the most important fix(es) and have ~50-~70 (code-) lines diff,
- take the whole 2.1 and have the full diff.
Does the release team have a preference?
Kind regards
T.
$ diff -burN sshfs-fuse-2.{0,1} | diffstat
ChangeLog | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
cache.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
cache.h | 3 ++-
configure | 20 ++++++++++----------
configure.ac | 2 +-
sshfs.1 | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
sshfs.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
7 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
And the relevant changelog entries:
2008-07-11 Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Fix statvfs extension to match the current protocol in
opensshfs
* Check version numbers of extensions, so such changes wouldn't
cause stupid behavior
seem worthwile to me
2008-06-24 Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Add '-F' option to specify the ssh config file. Patch by Pat Pascal.
could possibly be cut out, but is only ~10 lines of code change
2008-05-06 Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Fix bug in caching which could cause file corruption for append mode
writes. Reported by Jose Alonso
largest part, but also most important
2008-05-05 Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Fix compile on OS X. Original patch from Michael G Schwern
* Fix compile on Solaris. Reported by Jean-Jacques Sarton
not sure what this is exactly
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
