On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 06:00:39PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Robert Millan, le Fri 29 Aug 2008 18:46:23 +0200, a écrit : > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 01:43:14AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > One sad piece of news is that I wasn't able to contact upstream again: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't work any more. However, if people confirm > > > that he has been lost in nature, I intend to maintain loadlin as new > > > upstream. In any case, I can already provide a loadlin.exe built from > > > source that works for Lenny. I hope to find the time to get my patches > > > integrated during August. > > > > Any news on this? > > Ah, that's end of August already, gmrbl. No news from upstream still. > I have progressed on the coding side of yasm. The parser now being in C > my patch will be probably quite easy to get accepted as it won't modify > the existing behavior at all, only for the new tasm frontend. The last > bit I have to fix is the adress parsing which is a bit different between > nasm and tasm (the parser being in C will actually make things a bit > easier). loadlin is top on my TODO list now anyway.
I don't know how intrusive is your patch, but if upstream is not responsive, how would you [1] feel about proceeding without waiting for them? We still have the RC bug and it compromises win32-loader through its build-dependency. [1] and -release, of course -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]