* Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-21 22:53]: > 2008/9/5 Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > * Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-09 09:11]: > > > >> Am Samstag, den 10.05.2008, 07:33 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber: > >> > On 09/05/08 18:34 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > >> > > Package: octaviz > >> > > Version: 0.4.7-1 > >> > > Severity: important > >> > > > >> > > With the attached script and data, Octaviz segfaults on AMD64. > >> > > >> > As I discussed with Jordi earlier: this is arch-specific, it doesn't > >> > happen on i386. > >> > >> I've tracked this back till line 271 of vtkClipPolyData.cxx, where > >> cellScalars->GetComponent(1,0) > >> is a NaN value. > > > > Should this bug be considered release-critical, as it is now (severity level > > "serious")? > > Oops, I just saw this. Way after it mattered, since Thomas already > fixed the bug. > > But yeah, segfaults are very embarrassing. I do personally think they are > RC.
Sorry, the bug is already closed [1]. The segfault is avoided by introducing an argument check in vtk_trisurf.m. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=480431#54 -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]